NerdNumbers

Zapier vs Make: Which Automation Tool Is Better for Accountants?

A practical, accountant-focused comparison of the two most popular no-code automation platforms. We break down which is better for connecting your Xero, QBO, and practice management tools so you can stop copying data between systems.

At a Glance

Zapier

Our Pick

Connect your tools and automate workflows with no code required.

Best for: Quick automations between tools that do not natively integrate

Pricing: Free tier with 100 tasks/month. Paid plans from $29.99/month for 750 tasks.

Make

More powerful and affordable automation for complex workflows.

Best for: Firms wanting complex, multi-step automations

Pricing: Free tier with 1,000 operations/month. Paid plans from $10.59/month for 10,000 operations.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

How Zapier and Make compare across the features that matter most for UK accounting firm automation.

FeatureZapierMake
Ease of UseIntuitive trigger-action builder. Most staff can create simple Zaps in minutes with no training.Visual builder is powerful but takes longer to learn. Better suited to someone with a technical mindset.
Integration LibraryOver 6,000 integrations including Xero, QBO, Karbon, Dext, Ignition, and most UK accounting tools.Around 1,800 integrations. Covers the major tools but fewer niche accounting apps.
Complex WorkflowsMulti-step Zaps with paths and filters. Can handle moderate complexity but branching is limited.Full visual branching with parallel paths, loops, and routers. Handles highly complex scenarios well.
Pricing (High Volume)Can become expensive quickly. 750 tasks/month at $29.99, scaling up from there.10,000 operations/month at $10.59. Significantly cheaper for high-volume automation.
Visual BuilderLinear step-by-step layout. Clear and simple but does not visualise branching logic well.Full drag-and-drop canvas with visible connections, branches, and data flow. Easier to reason about complex logic.
Error HandlingRetry logic, error notifications, and task history. Solid for troubleshooting failed runs.Alternative error paths, break modules, and ignore directives. Equally capable with a different approach.
Accounting-Specific TriggersGood Xero and QBO triggers for invoices, contacts, payments. Some gaps in deeper accounting events.Similar coverage for Xero and QBO triggers. Both rely on the same underlying APIs.
Free Tier100 tasks/month with 5 single-step Zaps. Enough to test basic automations before committing.1,000 operations/month but limited to 2 active scenarios. More operations but fewer workflows.
Webhook SupportWebhooks available on paid plans. Catch hooks work but setup is less intuitive than Make.Native webhook support with instant triggers. Easier to configure and faster response times.
Data TransformationBasic formatting, lookups, and text manipulation. Adequate for simple data mapping.Built-in functions for parsing, aggregating, and transforming data. JSON, XML, and CSV handling is excellent.
Community & TemplatesLarge community with thousands of pre-built templates. Easy to find and adapt workflows for common use cases.Growing community but fewer ready-made templates. Less accounting-specific content available.
Real-Time TriggersMany triggers use polling (every 1 to 15 minutes depending on plan). Instant triggers for some apps.Webhooks and instant triggers are more widely available. Better for time-sensitive workflows.
Winner Tie

Pros & Cons

Zapier

What We Like

  • Largest integration library of any automation platform
  • No-code interface is genuinely easy to use
  • Free tier is generous for getting started
  • Reliable and well-established platform
  • Good documentation and community support

Watch Out For

  • Can become expensive at high task volumes
  • Complex multi-step Zaps can be difficult to debug
  • Some accounting-specific integrations are limited
  • Runs on a polling model (not real-time for all triggers)

Make

What We Like

  • More powerful than Zapier for complex workflows
  • Significantly cheaper at high volumes
  • Visual builder makes complex logic easier to understand
  • Better data transformation capabilities

Watch Out For

  • Steeper learning curve than Zapier
  • Smaller integration library
  • Less community support and fewer templates
  • Requires more technical confidence

Which Should You Choose?

The right choice depends on your firm's technical confidence, budget, and the complexity of the workflows you need. Here is our recommendation for each scenario.

For Most Firms

Zapier

Zapier is the safer default for most UK accounting firms. The massive integration library means it connects to virtually every tool in your stack, and the no-code interface means any team member can build and maintain automations. If you want to connect Xero or QBO to Karbon, Dext, Ignition, or Slack without any technical overhead, start here.

For Complex Workflows

Make

If your automation needs go beyond simple trigger-action patterns, Make is the better platform. The visual branching builder, powerful data transformations, and webhook support let you build sophisticated workflows that Zapier struggles with. Ideal if you have someone technically inclined on the team or work with an automation consultant.

For Budget-Conscious Firms

Make

If you are running high-volume automations, Make is dramatically cheaper. At 10,000 operations per month for $10.59 versus Zapier pricing hundreds for a similar volume, the cost difference is significant. For firms watching every line on the P&L, Make delivers more automation per pound spent.

Not sure which automation platform is right for your firm?

Book a free discovery call and we will help you choose the right automation tools and build workflows that save your team hours every week.

Book a Free Call
Zapier vs Make: Which Automation Tool Is Better for Accountants? | NerdNumbers | NerdNumbers